-
24 JAN 2012Post By
JT BentonHello again! Last week, we rolled out MobilePositive and gave a hint or two at what we’re up to. If you read that first post, you’d know that our new platform connects Advertisers with Consumers on the mobile web in a very meaningful and aligned way–driving heaps of quality inbound calls to our clients, daily. You would also know that I promised a follow up to that post explaining the timing of this rollout.
Thus, the title (or, question) of today’s contribution: Why mobile; why now?
Because it’s time. And, because before now, it wasn’t. Seriously.
If you’ve attended LeadsCon, Ad:Tech, Affiliate Summit or any other performance marketing event in the past four years, you’ve surely heard the hype on mobile. For years now, soapboxes at major industry shows have been occupied by folks signaling the ‘year of mobile.’ They blogged. They tweeted. They spammed us all on LinkedIn. Some of these zealots even went so far as to don QR-coded T-Shirts that were color coordinated to match their converse sneakers. Indeed, active were the hypesters.
And yet, despite all the hoopla, they were wrong. That’s right – flat wrong. At least in the context of the Cost-per-Lead media ecosystem. Mobile has been unworkable and unnecessaryuntil fairly recently. It’s taken Publishers, Advertisers, Networks and Consumers time to find the right way to play. We just weren’t ready, yet. Mostly, this was on the consumers and the publishers. It’s taken adoption rates skyrocketing, Apple’s stock booming, the Android market maturing, bandwidth levels rising and a whole host of other factors to get consumers ready for this at scale. For mobile publishers, the question has never been if – it’s been how and when. As in, ‘how and when can I make as much money selling leads as I do selling impressions and clicks.’ These groups needed to converge and align. It took help, muscle and risk. And, again, time. But now, it’s clear to me that it’s happening: mobile lead generation is alive and growing.
Ok. Before we get too far, I’m coming clean: I get the irony. In writing the above, one could argue that I’m now guilty of the same soapboxing I’ve just poked fun at. The argument is pretty linear, actually: I just said the people who announced the era of mobile lead-gen were wrong. And yet this post’s thesis is that the era of mobile lead-gen is, in fact, now here. Thin ice, right? Totally. Except I’ve got the in-house data to support this, and I see the interest on the advertiser side mounting: we introduce a new major advertiser to the mobile web weekly.
Last month, MobilePositive facilitated over 25,000 inbound phone calls to our early advertiser clients. These were direct, net-new customers, each happily dialing in. And, a considerably high number of them bought the services our clients were selling. These advertisers include leading brands in the Education, Mortgage, Insurance, Home Services and Identity Protection vertical markets. So far, the proof is the campaign performance. We see cost-per-sale figures that consistently perform on target and our budgets are growing. The publishers are happy, too. Both sides (buyers and sellers) see long-standing, steady campaign growth and an exciting new mix of partnerships as a big part of the upside to mobile.
So, why mobile? And, why now? Because – like I said, it’s time.
That’s all for today, gang. Thanks for reading. Next week, we’ll get more tactical with a piece on why publishers should love the pay-per-call format.
-
17 JAN 2012Post By
JT BentonHey, everybody – JT Benton here. I oversee DoublePositive’s new mobile marketing division, which we’re calling MobilePositive. While it’s true that I’m a rookie at DP, I’m certainly no stranger to the world of performance marketing.
I’ll be blogging here fairly frequently. I’m excited to share with you a bit about our growing work in mobile, how we plan to add value and show first-hand how easily the mobile web can drive alignment in a performance marketing format. I’ll also make it a consistent point to emphasize that this growth comes from a very solid foundation of connecting sales teams with live, interested customers on the phone. Indeed, I think it’s fitting that game-changing mobile marketing developments would come from the industry leader in delivering LIVE Hot Transfers.
I’ll spend most of my ‘air time’ describing our mobile product offerings and musing on the industry on large. The mobile web is quickly transforming the way advertisers connect with consumers, and MobilePositive is helping to lead the charge. As such, we’re learning a lot – and I have every intention of sharing these learnings with the reader along the way. With major Advertisers in the mortgage, EDU and insurance verticals already participating, our platform is driving tens of thousands of inbound calls monthly. We see lots of data, and we talk about this stuff all day. Just ask my wife.
So please, dig in. Follow us, and share with others that there’s a new player in mobile. And, don’t miss next Tuesday’s followup: Why mobile; why now?
-
26 OCT 2011Post By
Jodi SwartzDoublePositive Makes Key Hires to Expedite Growth and Broaden Service Offerings
It’s all about the people at DoublePositive Marketing Group, Inc., the undoubted leader in live telephone transfers and online marketing. And now, it’s all about MORE people. The company strengthened its online marketing team recently by making some key executive hires from powerhouses like AOL/Advertising.com and One-to-One Global, as well as others with deep experience in the space.
The recent hires—and their ability to deliver superior performance-based services—broaden the company’s industry reach and position the company to service new customers formerly unable to take advantage of live telephone transfers. Search engine marketing, display advertising, mobile marketing and advertising, and social media advertising round out the company’s online services suite.
Trent Walter, DoublePositive’s new vice president of national sales and former director of regional sales for AOL/Advertising.com, is enthusiastic about the offering. “Our technology is designed for real-time advertising. And, unlike others, our system, by design, aims to satisfy the performance goals of the advertiser, not the publishers or the networks.”
JT Benton, DoublePositive’s new vice president of mobile marketing, adds “we are committed to making a serious impact on the mobile web. Our mobile marketing division has a simple, vital mission: connect advertisers, publishers, and consumers on the mobile web. We will add value to every inquiry.”Two years ago the company committed to the online marketing space, and soon after hired Paul DiDonno, current vice president at DoublePositive and former strategy manager at AOL/Advertising.com, to manage their flagship education account. Brian Tomasette, current vice president of media products at DoublePositive and former director of product sales and agency partnerships at AOL/Advertising.com, was hired shortly after DiDonno.
“I came to DoublePositive to continue my passion for performance marketing in the education space, and for the people,” says DiDonno. “The (then) small team, everyone passionate about what they did, trusting each other, and everyone working for one goal—we made serious progress in a short amount of time.”
“It was an amazing opportunity to apply my experience and knowledge in online marketing. In the last two years, we have developed technology that surveys the marketplace, scores and optimizes bids based on our client’s performance goals, and then automatically adjusts those bids based on performance. That’s industry leading, and we continue to innovate.”
To support these initiatives, account management, delivery, media analysts, quality assurance, and sales teams are all in place lead by the industry’s most experienced and staffed with dozens of the industry’s brightest.
“We are really excited,” says Tomasette. “We are creating the future of online advertising, and are armed with all of the tools and people to make it something memorable.”
-
31 AUG 2011Post By
Rich DentWhen you’re hot, you’re hot, and DoublePositive is definitely hot.
First, we’re growing at a torrid pace. That’s why we decided to bring both our DP East and DP West teams to LeadsCon East in New York last week. Hopefully you got a chance to meet more of our talented people who are setting the industry on fire.
Second, we were happy to be in a position to underwrite LeadsCon East as Lead Sponsor this year. DoublePositive has had a hot hand, and this is one small way we were able to give back to the community.
Third, to really spice things up, we brought our own hot sauce to the event. It was a special fiery concoction that was brewed just for us. We passed out 250 bottles in New York. Yes, that’s me on the label. Hot stuff, I know.
Are you tough enough to take the heat? Can you handle all that Live Hot Transfers flavor? If you were one of the fortunate (or unfortunate!) ones to pick up a bottle, let us know if your tongue survived. And check back soon because I expect to have a few more posts about LeadsCon.
-
23 MAY 2011Post By
Brian OcheltreeHow to identify value while diversifying and increasing lead supply
Summary
- The value of aggregator leads – both shared and exclusive – has changed
- After self-generated leads, the best option might be aggregator leads, not paid search
- Shared leads are often a better value than if the same leads were exclusive
- Lead-Buyers should also test exclusive leads to determine whether they convert better
- New quick connections allow Buyers to add more lead supply, from more diverse sources, without adding IT integration costs
A New Mix of Business Drivers
When planning the integration of Internet leads into the company’s sales and marketing efforts, Lead-Buyers need to check their assumptions about shared versus exclusive leads. The market has changed. Optimized properly, both lead types can be significant growth drivers.
The Problem of Shared versus Exclusive
There’s a misunderstanding about the value of the different types of leads today. Because exclusive leads can be 2-3x the cost of shared leads, some Lead-Buyers think they are too expensive. But are they? Others think that because shared leads are shared, they are not worth the price. Is that correct? Could both be right?
Rather than guess at answers, DoublePositive recommends taking a step back and considering the facts.
Your Most Valuable Leads
First, a word about your most valuable type of online lead, the self-generated branded lead. These are the leads generated from your own website typically. Generally, these leads are the highest quality because they are from highly motivated, proactive consumers who tend to be “in market” and are therefore the consumers most likely to convert. In addition, self-generated leads are often very inexpensive since many come from free organic search traffic.
So, if self-generated branded leads are the best, and usually the cheapest, why do anything else?
In most cases, the volume of self-generated leads is not sufficient to hit required sales goals. Increasing the volume is a slow process, and Lead-Buyers can’t simply “step on the gas” to generate more self-generated leads overnight. You can use paid search to increase the volume quickly, but in most markets, this becomes cost prohibitive quickly due to brand advertisers bidding up the primary keywords to unrealistic prices. Think of trying to compete with Geico and Progressive for the key phrase “Auto Insurance” to drive traffic to your website. It doesn’t work. So, to fill the gap between self-generated leads and sales goals, aggregator leads are one of your best options. Both shared and exclusive should be considered and ideally tested since everyone’s situation is different.
Are Shared Leads a “Necessary Evil”?
Some Lead-Buyers have always believed that shared leads are bad. We hear it all the time. Shared leads are “a necessary evil”.
DoublePositive challenges our clients to look deeper before deciding whether that statement is true. Some shared leads are bad, no doubt. Perhaps most are. But we have found that if a shared lead is bad, it probably isn’t because it’s shared, but rather more likely due to other reasons. For example:
- The lead was generated from a low quality source
- The lead was sold too many times, or is aged
- A Lead-Buyer has abused the lead with unscrupulous dialing methods
Are Shared Leads Any Good?
A complaint I hear every day from our lead buying customers is that shared leads are no good because they are shared. There is too much competition fighting over the consumer’s attention, they complain.
While it may be true that these leads would be better if they were not shared, they become less attractive when the price is adjusted appropriately. Suppliers would have to charge 2-3x the price of a shared lead to make their economics work. And I do not believe these leads would convert 2-3x higher if they were exclusive, which would be required to justify the higher price. Keep in mind that if a consumer is truly “in-market” and motivated to buy, it is likely that they visited multiple supplier sites and submitted multiple forms, so even though you got an exclusive lead from one supplier, you probably aren’t the only sales organization calling that lead.
During a recent client visit, my client asked “How do the lead suppliers do it? They only charge me $7 a lead, and it costs me $50 per lead to generate on my own through paid search.” I was speechless. This was the first time I had ever been asked that question, and usually it’s the opposite. In my opinion, sharing the leads is a big reason the economics work for all of us.
What about Exclusive Leads?
If all else is equal (lead type, lead source, speed to lead, etc.), then an exclusive lead should convert higher than a shared lead simply because there are fewer companies pursuing the sale. However, all else is rarely equal, and these other attributes contribute more to the likelihood to convert than the exclusivity attribute, I believe.
Just as with shared leads, some exclusive leads are good, and some are bad. We believe the best plan is to include them in your testing and optimization process along with shared leads so that you can see which type and sources convert the best for your particular situation. As long as all lead sources are optimized for Cost Per Sale Per Supply Source (see DoublePositive white paper “Tapping the Value of Supplier Leads” at http://bit.ly/lnjmaz), the more supply sources you have, the better. For the clients whose lead supply we manage, we rarely see the cheapest lead source being the lowest cost per sale, or the highest priced lead source being the highest cost per sale. It is different in almost every case, and it changes over time as each supply source adds new affiliates, and other lead sources to their offering.
Access to More Suppliers
As we have shown in previous white papers, there are compelling financial reasons for having as many supply sources as possible.
A supplier offering exclusive leads generated from search is just one example of the multiple lead sources available. In our opinion, every Lead-Buyer should try out as many lead sellers as they can. Especially since the greatest obstacles to connecting with these suppliers has been eliminated.
Utilizing Third-Party Connectivity
In the past, the technical integration to connect to more suppliers was difficult and time consuming. For many clients, getting connected to new suppliers could take months, if not a year or more, due to the technical and testing requirements with each data feed. This level of complexity and cost prevented most companies from engaging with any but the largest of suppliers, at least initially, thus limiting their supply diversification. It has been difficult to justify the effort for a small set of new suppliers.
Third-party connectivity platforms have eliminated this problem. DoublePositive’s Lead Funnel, for example, facilitates and automates the physical connection to many lead sources automatically. Lead-Buyers simply build one physical connection that is already connected to multiple supply sources. This allows them to maintain a direct relationship with the supplier, without incurring technology integration costs.
Lead-Buyers with a Lead Funnel can turn the lead flow on and off for new suppliers, without any expense, and pay only for leads. Let’s take another look at how it works:
In the above illustration, “You” are using a DoublePositive Lead Funnel to make a single data connection to multiple, diverse suppliers. Our proprietary Translation Engine handles the entire custom data mapping per supply source. By building one connection to the Lead Funnel, the company can be connected to virtually every supplier, large and small, quickly and efficiently.
Once the necessary connections are in place, Lead-Buyers can add and test new sources at the same time, filling the gap between self-generated leads and sales goals.
Review
What options are available for companies looking to leverage diversified lead types and drive growth? Let’s review the facts.
- Misconceptions about the value of shared versus exclusive leads can cause missed opportunities for today’s Lead-Buyer
- A shared lead can be good or bad, depending on factors such as speed-to-lead, quality of lead, lead type, source, etc.
- The best exclusive leads often are not exclusive, because a motivated buyer is likely to visit multiple “exclusive” supplier sites and submit multiple forms
- Connecting to a Lead Funnel allows companies add more suppliers and test more shared and exclusive leads, without adding IT costs
- Companies that pay only for the lead, and optimize their supply sources, can successfully use both shared and exclusive leads to reach sales goals
-
22 APR 2011Post By
Rich DentBack in February, in my post How to Strengthen Contact Rates , I told you guys about the new inbound-outbound service DoublePositive had recently launched.
As I mentioned at the time, our contact rate is historically about 50% – but early this year, we saw that rate dipping. We knew the problem had to do with smart phones and the personal firewall they create. According to the most recent Nielsen report, as of December 2010, 31% of cell phone users in the United States are smartphone users.
Show of hands. If I called you on your smart phone right now, and you didn’t recognize the number, would you answer?
Probably not. Over 90% of consumers would ignore an unknown number, according to an informal survey I ran on Facebook. But those same consumers said they probably would call back if the caller tried to reach them more than once. Wouldn’t you?
Our new inbound call-back service was born.
So, are they calling us back?
It’s still very early, and so far, we’ve limited our test to mortgage leads. But I can tell you definitively that we’ve seen a lot of call-backs. And when they call, one of two things is happening. Either they hang up right away (“Oh, it’s ABC Mortgage. I don’t feel like talking to them right now”), or they stay on the phone because they are interested in speaking with a representative. Those in the second category are transferring at 70%, a very high rate.
What does that mean to lead buyers and lead sellers?
It means we are improving the performance of your leads. Keep in mind, those call-backs are consumers we previously never would have been able to contact.
As a result of this early success, we decided to roll out our call-back service across all verticals. Our new test group is 80% of all the leads we are dialing on, and we are holding 20% back as a control group. I will share the results as soon as comparative data becomes available.
Meantime, we’re still asking ourselves, what else can we do to get people to call us back?
Local versus 800
At LeadsCon in Vegas last month, DoublePositive partner Joey Liner spoke on a panel with Ken Krogue, President of InsideSales.com, a dialer manufacturer. Ken confirmed what DoublePositive had long suspected. He said that InsideSales.com had seen a nice uplift in performance by displaying local numbers to consumers, instead of 800 numbers.
In our experience, this seemed true. Prior the conference, we had conducted another informal survey on Facebook. We asked, would you be more likely to answer the phone if the caller was a local number versus an 800 number? Again, over 90% of consumers told us they would be more likely to answer a local number, because it might be someone they know.
DoublePositive decided to test this theory. We reached out to one of our key clients in the mortgage industry, and will perform a test on the leads we dial on their behalf. The expectation is that using local numbers will increase our contact and transfer rates. We’ll let you know how it goes.
Needs evolve. Buying habits change. The important thing for all of us is to keep innovating. Stay ahead of the curve, and you’ll be ready for where the market takes you next.
Your turn. What are you doing to get consumers to call you back?
-
23 FEB 2011Post By
Rich DentLast month I wrote about the “perfect storm” for lead buyers. Like most storms, it didn’t last long.
Here we are, about a month later, and the refi market is shrinking fast. There are fewer and fewer people looking to refinance or able to refinance. As a result, the few leads that are available are sold more times.
Some of our clients and partners here at DoublePositive were seeing their transfer rates dip. They called us to say, “What’s going on?”
Rather than blame the economy (where does that get you?), we turned the question on ourselves. Are we doing everything we can to get as many new transfers over to our clients as possible? We already knew the leads were being sold the maximum amount of times, and speed-to-lead was no longer the secret sauce. We needed a new recipe that would allow us to contact more people.
Today I’ll share with you the first part of our answer, which we’re very excited about: our new inbound call-back service.
“You say outbound, I say inbound.”
Historically, when we call the consumer, they answer the phone 50% of the time – but lately that contact rate is dipping. Part of the problem now is, more consumers are using their cell phones as their primary phone number. They hide behind a personal firewall, screening their calls, especially numbers they don’t recognize. We had to find another way to reach them.
And so we followed a hunch. We assumed that consumers, if they saw the same number flashing in their caller ID a couple times, would wonder who is trying to reach them, and call the number back. To test this theory, and prove that we could get more consumers to answer their phones or call us back, we developed inbound call-back technology.
Here’s how it works:
- DoublePositive (Call Center A) outbound dials on an online inquiry
- Consumer does not answer the phone
- Consumer calls back phone number on their Caller ID (phone number provided by RingRevenue)
- Consumer routed to an IVR (also provided to us by RingRevenue)
- Consumer can either choose to speak with our client or can be added to our DNC
- Consumer chooses to speak to our client. Call routed to DoublePositive Inbound Call Center (Call Center B)
- DoublePositive agent answers call, confirms interest and transfers call to client
- Call Center B sends disposition in real time through DoublePositive to Call Center A and the lead is immediately marked as transfer and removed from the queue
To learn more about RingRevenue, our partner in providing inbound call-back services, check out the press release.
Lead buyers benefit from this solution, because not only are we the first to reach their leads with our outbound calling, but we’ve also found a way to capture those who are screening their calls and get them to call us back, improving transfer rates.
Lead sellers benefit because this service ultimately improves the performance of their leads. In a perfect world, we will contact more leads and transfer more borrowers to the lender. Ideally, lenders will convert more of those leads to loans, and will buy more leads. Win-win-win.
Statistically speaking, it’s still early, but the initial data indicates a slight rise in contact rates. It appears to be working. Week over week, more and more people are calling us back.
The cool part, to me, is how synchronized our two call center operations are. Though they are in different parts of the country, our centers are talking to the consumer and communicating with each other seamlessly, in real time. As a result, we are poised to contact more people and transfer more calls.
Check back soon because we have more to come. DoublePositive is rolling out a suite of innovative products in the coming weeks. In the meantime, please let us know what you think of our inbound call-back concept, in the comments below.
-
16 FEB 2011
Google Is Dead
A post by Syed Zaidi as Google, Hot Transfers, Industries, Internet, Lead Generation, Marketing, Mobile, Technology, Technology Updates
Post By
Syed ZaidiBefore you get your knickers in a bunch I have to tell you that I don’t hate Google. I love Google. Sure, DoublePositive runs its systems on a Microsoft platform. Sure, we process millions of leads per month and capture hundreds of gigs of data on a weekly basis – all on a Microsoft foundation that is rock solid. But that doesn’t mean I am a Microsoft activist. Nor am I an Apple fanboi (yes, it is spelled with an ‘i’). Yes, I own an iPhone, and an iPod, and an AppleTV, and a Macbook, but not that craptastic Airport Express. In fact, as a technologist I love all these companies. But I love Google a little bit more. ;) I love the story, I love the logo, I love their clothing line, and I love the breadth of the work they do. However, Google is having their lunch eaten…by Amazon.
Amazon? I never saw any book sales on Google’s balance sheet? Oh, so you must be talking about Amazon’s announcement of its public release of the all-new and improved A9 platform for consumer use. I kid, I kid. Ok seriously, what I am talking about is that Amazon is kicking Google’s butt in one particular market. And that is the mindshare and market of software developers.
Sometime in the mid-2000’s someone at Amazon realized that the tools and processes they use internally could be valuable to the developer and business community. Starting with the release of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk in 2007 Amazon AWS was born. Ever since, Amazon has been on a tear, releasing valuable developer service after valuable developer service. At the same time (circa 1980) Google mashups were all the rage. Everyone wanted to have a Google maps mashup (ok, fine, it only feels like 30 years ago). Since then, however, Google for the developer community has been stagnant. Between that stupid ‘by invite only’ setup, and a series of Google mishaps (Google Wave, Google Voice Search, Google Phone, no cloud computing, etc.) Google is losing the battle for the mind of the business software developer. There is no way I can possibly present a full analysis on the two companies with respect to their developer mindshare strategy without writing a book. Instead, here is my non-comprehensive and biased comparison chart:

Amazon Services vs. Google ServicesA lot of what you see above may not be important to you or your business. But that’s not the issue. The issue here is that Amazon has first mover advantages in almost all of the areas listed above. At first I thought most of the Amazon advantages only applied to small or nimble companies like DoublePositive. However, the more CIOs I talk to, the more are using Amazon. Cloud Computing and large-scale storage are not fun to implement nor are they easy to manage. Lots and lots of companies, big and small are willing to pay a premium just to offload the headache. Additionally, Amazon is churning out high quality services at a rate that Google cant match. Google is stuck in perpetual beta mode and can’t get out of its own way. So what does all this mean for Google and Amazon? I don’t know. I do know that everyone I talk to is jumping on the Amazon bandwagon as fast as they possibly can. From the largest of companies to the newest of startups, Amazon is taking more and more developer mindshare. What I do know is that Amazon is transforming itself into the go to business partner for growing and nimble business while Google is continuing down the path of B2C dominance. Can the two coexist peacefully? Will their paths converge and turn into a battle for the ages? How does Microsoft fit into this picture? It’s going to be a great story to watch. I need some popcorn.
P.S. Here are some projects that we implemented using Amazon:
1. Large scale file management (hundreds of millions of files)
2. DNS
3. Geographical load balancing
4. Data Cubing
5. Quality Control on repetitive tasks
6. B2B database building
7. System backups
8. Image tagging
9. Transcription Services -
15 FEB 2011Post By
Brian TomasettePress release on RingRevenue’s site
Partnership allows lead buyers to generate more voice leads, minimize consumer contact time, maximize consumer contact, and improve ROI.
Santa Barbara, CA (February 15, 2011) – Today, RingRevenue, the leader in call performance marketing and DoublePositive Marketing Group, specializing in LIVE Hot Transfers, formally announced their partnership to deliver high-quality, live voice leads to national lead buyers in higher education, insurance and financial services. Since launching a series of call performance marketing campaigns with selected customers in late 2010, the partnership has already generated thousands of inbound live voice leads.
“We know the most valuable scenario is having the consumer on the phone from the start when their interest level is the highest and they are the most likely to convert to a paying customer,” says Brian Tomasette, Vice President of Media Products for DoublePositive. “Our partnership with RingRevenue allows us to deliver even more value to our customers by increasing the return on their advertising spend. Using RingRevenue, we’re able to include unique phone numbers in every advertisement. By doing so we are able to more accurately measure the effectiveness of those ad placements and we consistently see contact and conversion rate improvements on those ads and lead forms that include phone numbers.”
While marketers pay millions of dollars each year for leads and lead generation form completions, what they really want is customers. “The inherent challenge with lead forms is that consumers are at their peak interest level when they fill out the form, but the minute they hit the submit button they are on to something else and their interest level begins to decline,” adds Tomasette. The combination of inbound and outbound hot transfers allows a lead buyer to drastically minimize consumer contact time and maximize contact percentage, one of top metrics in lead value.
With RingRevenue’s call performance marketing solution, DoublePositive leverages strategic media placements and partnerships with publishers to drive inbound phone calls to unique toll-free phone numbers that connect consumers to agents in DoublePositive’s call center. The combination of RingRevenue’s call quality filtering technology and DoublePositive’s live agents qualifies the caller, confirms their interest and connects them live to the advertiser’s sales representatives.
“DoublePositive, like RingRevenue, is built on the premise that having the consumer directly on the phone is of great value to the advertiser,” says Jason Spievak, CEO of RingRevenue. “The combination of our technology and their call center’s qualification and live transfer process ensures that advertisers are delivered a high volume of quality voice leads that are ready to become customers.”
“We looked at a lot of call tracking vendors in our search to find the right partner. RingRevenue has a leadership team with a proven track record in both telephony and performance marketing, which is very important to us,” says Tomasette. “Off the shelf, the RingRevenue platform comes fully equipped with all of the lead generation tools we need: call ROI by keyword search tracking, instant access to promotional phone numbers, advanced call routing, creative services, great real time reporting and more. We knew we could easily get up and running right away and stay focused on delivering value to our clients. Our advertisers are already seeing the benefit in the form of new customers, increases in quality leads and expanded distribution.”
Both companies will be attending LeadsCon Las Vegas 2011 March 1-2, the premier conference for the online lead generation industry. DoublePositive is a Gold Sponsor of the event and can be heard talking about the power of phone calls in the panel session: All About The Call – From Speed to Lead to Call Center Effectiveness, on March 1.
About RingRevenue
RingRevenue improves every marketing campaign with better quality leads, higher conversions and increased ROI. By tapping the power of the phone, RingRevenue’s patent-pending call performance marketing platform captures and converts more high-value customers. RingRevenue’s comprehensive tracking and analytics consistently increase revenues from mobile, print and other “offline” media while also improving the performance of online campaigns such as search, email and display. RingRevenue powers many of the leading performance marketing networks and agencies. To learn more about RingRevenue or to request a demo, please visit ringrevenue.com or call 866-943-6426.
About DoublePositive
DoublePositive Marketing Group, Inc. bridges the “last mile” of converting traditional (data-only) leads into sales. DoublePositive has evolved the model of lead generation to provide sales professionals with a live, qualified, and interested consumer, along with the consumer’s data, all in real time. DoublePositive primarily serves clients and lead providers in the mortgage leads, online education enrollment leads, and insurance leads industries. To learn more visit: www.doublepositive.com.
-
31 JAN 2011
Real 3D TV may be on the horizon
A post by Nikolay as Technology
If you are thinking about getting one of those new 3D flat screens, you may want to think again. Those that are currently available require special eyeglasses to achieve 3D effect. It is kind of awkward and reminds me of the first TVs (like this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVN-49) with tiny screen and big water-filled lens (like a fish bowl) in front of it to magnify the picture. Future 3D displays may be as far from these first 3D panels as current flat panel TVs are from TV sets of 60 years ago.
In the University of Arizona College of Optical Sciences professor Nasser Peyghambarian and his team are developing holographic display capable to create real 3D images visible without any special devices. Principles of holography are well known in optics, and stationary holograms are nothing new, but here scientists managed to create a device which is capable to “re-write” the holographic image using specially designed polymer film. For now, they can update the picture once in a couple of seconds, but they are confident that refresh rate may be improved. There are a lot of scientific and engineering problems that have to be resolved before this technology become commercially viable, but even in its current state it is very impressive. More details can be found here:Â http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-holograms-science-fiction-reality-video.html.






