<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 vs. 2008 vs. 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/</link>
	<description>DoublePositive &#124; LIVE Hot Transfers Leads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne P.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>FHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P. Fenlon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P. Fenlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>OMG!

ADMONISH??? REALLY???

This is so outrageously unexpected that I&#039;m beside myself:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/09words.htm

But then again, I&#039;m biased. ;-)

SPF

p.s. no need to disclose T and F in 2009 -- later is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG!</p>
<p>ADMONISH??? REALLY???</p>
<p>This is so outrageously unexpected that I&#8217;m beside myself:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/09words.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/09words.htm</a></p>
<p>But then again, I&#8217;m biased. ;-)</p>
<p>SPF</p>
<p>p.s. no need to disclose T and F in 2009 &#8212; later is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P. Fenlon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P. Fenlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>kg,

Short for Kagey (aka Cagey)?  Probably not the Kevin Garnett that I know.

Good guesses methinks.  Mostly goodâ€¦ 8700 seems low to me right now.

Looking backwards, I think weâ€™ll need to disqualify previous Word(s)-of-the-Year â€“ after all, â€œbailoutâ€ already won in 2008.

That still leaves you with 8 good guesses.

My stock plan worked out well â€“ hereâ€™s what I bought:

TREE at $2.11
GOOG at $311
AAPL at $91.49

I hope Iâ€™m wrong, but I sense some hostility in your comment â€“ I hope not to fan those flames, even if I do not provide the best date(s) to sell the above-named stocks in the future.

SPF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kg,</p>
<p>Short for Kagey (aka Cagey)?  Probably not the Kevin Garnett that I know.</p>
<p>Good guesses methinks.  Mostly goodâ€¦ 8700 seems low to me right now.</p>
<p>Looking backwards, I think weâ€™ll need to disqualify previous Word(s)-of-the-Year â€“ after all, â€œbailoutâ€ already won in 2008.</p>
<p>That still leaves you with 8 good guesses.</p>
<p>My stock plan worked out well â€“ hereâ€™s what I bought:</p>
<p>TREE at $2.11<br />
GOOG at $311<br />
AAPL at $91.49</p>
<p>I hope Iâ€™m wrong, but I sense some hostility in your comment â€“ I hope not to fan those flames, even if I do not provide the best date(s) to sell the above-named stocks in the future.</p>
<p>SPF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>kg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>S,

How&#039;s your &quot;Buy Stocks Now&quot; plan working out? A while back you were waxing double-positive about what a great time it was to buy into the market. If I recall, the DOW was around 8700 when the advice was dispensed.

I would say the word for the year will be one of these:

depression
nationalization
socialism
takeover
deflation
unemployment
bailout
regulation
universal (as in healthcare)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S,</p>
<p>How&#8217;s your &#8220;Buy Stocks Now&#8221; plan working out? A while back you were waxing double-positive about what a great time it was to buy into the market. If I recall, the DOW was around 8700 when the advice was dispensed.</p>
<p>I would say the word for the year will be one of these:</p>
<p>depression<br />
nationalization<br />
socialism<br />
takeover<br />
deflation<br />
unemployment<br />
bailout<br />
regulation<br />
universal (as in healthcare)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Totally fu..?
lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally fu..?<br />
lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Liner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Liner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Well I know what T is but donâ€™t know what the F is :)

I won&#039;t spill the beans just yet!

I believe the word of the year will be &quot;Change&quot; or &quot;Obama&quot;

Sean- I donâ€™t think the folks that decide the word will get that sophisticated based on the T; they have to use a word that the entire population uses regularly throughout the year.

Joey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I know what T is but donâ€™t know what the F is :)</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t spill the beans just yet!</p>
<p>I believe the word of the year will be &#8220;Change&#8221; or &#8220;Obama&#8221;</p>
<p>Sean- I donâ€™t think the folks that decide the word will get that sophisticated based on the T; they have to use a word that the entire population uses regularly throughout the year.</p>
<p>Joey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doublepositive.com/2009/01/27/2007-vs-2008-vs-2009/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>If January is any indication of what is to come this year, my early prediction would be the word &quot;stimulus.&quot;

T and F -- you&#039;ve got me there SPF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If January is any indication of what is to come this year, my early prediction would be the word &#8220;stimulus.&#8221;</p>
<p>T and F &#8212; you&#8217;ve got me there SPF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

