our blog

  • Post By
    Syed Zaidi

    Alright, so its time to get down and dirty with the candidates viewpoint(s) on foreign policy. No love lost here, folks. I thought it would be funny to see their viewpoints on a country by country basis rather than a general foreign policy. Let me know what I missed:

     

    Obama

    McCain

    Iran

    Calls Iran the single biggest beneficiary of the Iraq war.  "Thanks
    to George Bush’s policy, Iran is the greatest threat to the United States and
    Israel and the Middle East for a generation. John McCain wants to double down
    on that failed policy."  Will down to sit down and talk to Iranian
    President. Said he is open to ‘tough and principled diplomacy’ with Iran

    Calls Obama reckless and naive when it comes to the Iranian threat. 
    Considers the Iranian threat ‘anything but tiny’.  Advisors have indicated
    that the US should work with Israel to take preventive action against Iran.  Limited
    policy information other than responses to Obama remarks.

     

     

     

    Iraq

    Voted against war in Iraq calling it a ‘dumb war’.  Proposes we stay
    in Iraq under a defined timeline of withdrawal.  Against the troop surge,
    says its not a long term solution

    Voted for war in Iraq.  Proposes we stay in Iraq until ‘the job is
    done’.  Supported troop surge as a tactical maneuver.  Has, in general,
    called for an increase in troops involvement.

     

     

     

    Korea

    Opposes S. Korean Free Trade Agreement.  Citing lack of concern for organized
    labor. “Senator Obama does not support the S. Korea FTA … and is troubled
    that the Bush administration has not done more to help American workers who
    are losing their jobs as a result of a changing worldwide economy”. 

    On N. Korea he would create a new ad-hoc framework beyond the 6 party
    talks.  Would push regional leads (Japan, China, etc.) to push regional
    stability and prosperity.  Would also crack down on Non-Proliferation Treaty
    so that N. Korea would face harsh international sanctions if violations occur. 
    Would be willing to sit down with Kim Jong-il.

    Supports Korean FTA.  “We have negotiated a trade agreement with S.
    Korea that will expand American exports and create American jobs”.  On N.
    Korea – would push S. Korea to forefront instead of direct talks.  Has a ‘hawkish’
    stance on N. Korea and has criticized Bush administration for softening
    stance on N. Korea.  McCain has said he knows what Kim Jong-il wants: “a
    diminished American presence in Asia, payments for one part of his nuclear
    program and no accountability for other and a free hand for his regime to torture
    underground Christians…”

     

     

     

    Cuba

    At one point favored normal relations with Cuba.  Would meet with new
    president of Cuba.  Would pursue direct presidential diplomacy, immediate
    change in policy to allow for unlimited family visitation, and remittances to
    the island.   

    Believes that Raul Castro is worse than Fidel in many ways.  Supports
    continued economic pressure.  Believes that Cubans tortured Americans in
    Vietnam.

     

     

     

    Israel/Palestine

    Has pledged unwavering support for Israel.  Endorsed idea that any
    peace deal between the Israelis and Palestinians must preserve Israel as a
    Jewish state with Jerusalem as its capital.  “Will always keep the threat of
    military action on the table to defend our security and our ally, Israel”. 
    Called on Israel to help foster peace by refraining from building settlements
    on what is widely considered Palestinian Land and allowing the Palestinians
    more freedom of movement.

    Looking to micro-manage Israeli/Palestinian relations.  Expects “concessions
    and sacrifices by both sides”.  Believes “America’s unequivocal support for
    Israel – not evenhandedness, not moral equivalence, not winking at
    Palestinian violence – is the best guarantor of peace in the Middle East”. 
    Consistently supports foreign aid to Israel and an isolated Hamas-led
    Palestinian Authority.

  • Post By
    Syed Zaidi

    Finally! Jeez, the Democrats took forever on that one. 
    Well, now that both parties have a candidate to rally around we can get this
    show on the road.  So, the one thing the staff at DoublePositive does not lack is
    opinions, especially when it comes to politics.  Everyone has their own views,
    but I thought I would do my part by trying to distinguish between the
    candidates to help others make informed decisions.  By no means am I an expert
    when it comes to this kind of stuff.  However, I am hoping to use this forum to
    cover a number of different areas including the war in Iraq, healthcare reform,
    and the social security situation.  The first part in this series will attempt
    to draw distinctions between the two candidates on the subject of the economy. 
    I figured the easiest way to do this is in a tabular format:

     

    Barack Obama

    John McCain

    The cause of the mortgage market meltdown

    Somewhat vague in this area.  Leans towards fraud on the part of
    banks and other ‘unfriendly’ practices.  Does not specifically mortgage
    brokers as a cause.

    Speculation by both banks and individual borrowers.  Places blame on
    the shoulders of all involved, including banks, brokers, and borrowers.

     

     

     

    The solution to the mortgage market meltdown

    Direct Federal intervention.  Proposing the need for a relief package
    of at $10 Billion to prevent foreclosures.  Funds would come from greater
    enforcement and fines of existing regulations.

    Insists that no government action is needed.  Recently McCain has
    stated “It is not the duty of the government to bail out those who act
    irresponsibly. Whether they are big banks or small borrowers”.

     

     

     

    On Non-Corporate Taxes

    Has indicated preference to increase Social Security tax, Capital
    Gains tax, Dividend tax, and Income tax for the highest wage earners. Would
    lower tax burden on lowest income groups. Does not support break in gas tax. 
    Would reduce AMT and Estate tax (but not as much as McCain)

    Supports the extension of President Bush’s tax cuts for those who
    earn greater than $250k per year.  Would let capital gains tax reduction
    reset and go up.  Supports a summer ‘holiday’ on the gas tax.  Would not make
    any changes to NAFTA.  Would reduce AMT and Estate tax.

     

     

     

    On Corporate Taxes

    Believes companies should pay ‘fair share’ of tax burden.  Reduce
    corporate subsidies.

    Would lower corporate taxes, make expensing rules more generous for
    small business.  Wants CEO pay regulation.

     

     

     

    On the Deficit

    Talks about reducing deficit but The Tax Policy Center estimates that
    over 10 years Obama’s plan would increase the deficit by $3.3 Trillion

    Talks about reducing deficit but The Tax Policy Center estimates that
    over 10 years McCain’s plan would increase the deficit by $4.5 Trillion

     

    This is definitely not all encompassing but I figured it was
    a good start.  What am I missing?

  • Post By
    Joey Liner

    I look forward to attending the event hosted by Jay Weintraub and David Rodnitzky. As most of you know in the lead generation world, Jay was responsible for a “game changing” conference this year in LeadsCon so I am looking forward to the first followup event out in San Francisco. If you are attending please reply back to the post or email me joey@doublepositive.com so we can hook up. Below is a description to the event if you need to register:

    Click Here for Invitation

    Join us and 150 of your soon to be closest friends next Thursday, June 12 at the first-ever Lead Gen Mixer held at downtown San Francisco’s Thirsty Bear from 6pm to 8pm.

    We’ll do our best to give preference to attendees of LeadsCon and members of the Online Lead Gen group, but now would be a good time to show not just how much fun you are but anti-procrastinating as well!

    We are on track to sell out before next Thursday so don’t delay.

    Given the limited space, we are charging an RSVP fee of $15 + $0.99 processing fee with Eventbrite so that those who RSVP attend. Come hungry and thirsty as you have two hours of all you can eat and drink. You’ll break even in the first fifteen minutes and drink your way to profitability in no time!

    Many thanks to our terrific sponsors – Marin Software, Reply.com, eBureau, and Media Venture Partners who have allowed us to offer this great event at this price.

    Lead Gen Mixer San Francisco

    Hosted By Jay Weintraub and David Rodnitzky

    When
    Thursday, June 12, 2008 from 06:00 PM – 08:00 PM (PT)

    Location
    Thirsty Bear
    661 Howard St.
    San Francisco, CA 94105

    Cheers,
    Joey

image